![]() ![]() Auto-refresh on mouse-up might be a good idea in the future. However, if you hit the refresh button all is well again. It does have a bug though in that the default position of this thumbnail is seemingly chosen at random and when you pan in the window it doesn’t update. This was a nice touch that I felt that some of the other programs in the round-up might benefit from adding to their user-interfaces. ![]() However, if there’s one redeeming feature of the UI (albeit with a odd quirk – more on that later), is that several presets on how you can do noise reduction are featured on the left hand side which show you the results on your image. However, what I did find was that there were a variety of UI quirks (like a menu button that displayed a context menu) and just flat out bugs (like sliders that begin to vanish due to z-order issues when you drag them all the way to the right). I wasn’t very impressed with the user-interface, but then again that’s what I do for my day job so I might be a bit biased. The user-interface here is just just basic programming with only one real “feature” and that is its presets section with a visual preview (that isn’t dynamic). Of the products reviewed in the previous round-up I’d say this user-interface is probably closest to the winner – Noiseware, but not in a good way. This article is a quick review of the product using some of the same images and methodologies, but not exactly the same format. However, recently I had a chance to play around with DeNoise 3 and the results were much better. Initially, I did download Topaz DeNoise 2.x and was very unimpressed, so I didn’t bother to write an article. I had never heard of Topaz Labs, so this was a new revelation for me. In response to my Noise Reduction Software Roundup article, several readers commented that I should try out Topaz Labs DeNoise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |